Powered byWebtrack Logo


Seriously, some of my best friends are anti-Semites

MY favourite definition of an anti-Semite is "a person who hates Jews more than is absolutely necessary". Susan Chandler, the former Victorian Liberal Party campaign manager who described a colleague as a "greedy f..king Jew", appears to qualify.

The object of Chandler's affection was Adam Held, the Liberal candidate at the recent federal election for the Victorian seat of Melbourne Ports. Held is Jewish, as is his opponent, the sitting member Michael Danby.

It appears Held earned Chandler's ire during the campaign when he committed the unforgivable sin of doing an Oliver Twist and asking for more. It wasn't gruel he was after but extra political pamphlets for his campaign. Chandler obviously thought it was a plot by the Elders of Zion to corner the market in political pamphlets. Today pamphlets, tomorrow the world.

One would have thought that in view of Held's work ethic a more apt description would have been "a hardworking f..king Jew".

Clearly, Chandler is not the sharpest knife in the Liberal drawer. Anyone with an IQ above room temperature would not have committed such terms of endearment to email. Nor would they have been outraged at the suggestion that they had done anything wrong. "Anti-Semitic? Moi? Some of my best friends are Jews." She may have a few less in the not-too-distant future.

It's strange how anti-Semites rarely recognise their own prejudice. As a young and promising golfer I indicated to my boss, a charming and cultured man, that I was interested in joining his golf club. "Sorry, son, no Jews, jockeys or jailbirds." He couldn't recognise his responsibility as a human being to take a principled stand against anti-Semitism.

In the 1940s, when Jews were unable to join any of the A-grade clubs in Sydney or Melbourne, they decided to build their own clubs and were immediately attacked for being exclusive. That the clubs had non-Jewish members was conveniently ignored.

After World War II, and the attempt by the Nazis to destroy European Jewry, there was sympathy and support for the establishment of a Jewish homeland in the mandated territories of Palestine. When the UN voted in November 1947 to create an Arab and a Jewish state, the neighbouring Arab countries attacked the Jewish state.

That Israel survived was first met with disbelief, then awe and finally anger. Those, particularly on the Left, who had wept openly for the murdered millions, started to resent Jews no longer being victims.

How dare Jews win? How dare they defend themselves against those who wished to destroy them? How dare they refuse to accede to the absurd demands of the people who had created the problem by refusing to accept the UN decision? Jews had decided that they no longer wanted the sympathy and tears of the liberal Left. They wanted to survive, on their own terms.

As Israel repulsed attempts to destroy it, the anger of the liberal Left increased in intensity. As internationally famous lawyer Alan Dershowitz stated, "Throughout the world, from the chambers of the UN to the campuses of universities, Israel is singled out for condemnation, disinvestment, boycott and demonisation."

Anti-Semitism? "No! No!" cried Israel's critics. "We don't hate Jews, just Israel." For many, Israel became the pariah state. Anti-Semitism became acceptable again. The New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman responded: "Criticising Israel is not anti-Semitic and saying so is vile. But singling out Israel for opprobrium and international sanction, out of all proportion to any other party in the Middle East, is anti-Semitic and not saying so is dishonest."

It's the double standards by which Israel is judged that incenses Jews and their supporters.

Dershowitz's story of Harvard University president A. Lawrence Lowell's attempt to limit the number of Jews admitted to Harvard in the 1920s because "Jews cheat" is the classic double standard. When an important alumnus objected on the grounds that non-Jews also cheated, Lowell replied, "You're changing the subject. I'm talking about Jews."

In Australia today many journalists are incapable of recognising their own deep-seated prejudices. When I asked one journalist why he and many of his colleagues felt it necessary to mention that certain businesspeople were Jewish, particularly those who had brushes with the law, he bridled at the suggestion that this was anti-Semitic. "It's part of the story," he spluttered.

"Really?" I replied. "How, exactly?" He was unable to give a coherent reply. I asked, "Do you know and mention the religion of James Packer, Rupert Murdoch, Christopher Skase, Kerry Stokes or Alan Bond?"

"No," he replied, somewhat shamefaced.

"And nor should you," I told him, "Because it's irrelevant."

Others were more astute. No mention of religion. They just pointed out that the person they were writing about was a regular visitor to Israel. More clever still was the television program about a Jewish businessman who had just been released from jail. No mention he was Jewish, just a shot of him with his rabbi. Anti-Semitic? Perish the thought.

Then there's the sinister Jewish lobby. One Canberra journalist becomes apoplectic on the subject. Again, no mention of the Catholic, Protestant, Islamic, union or dozens of business and special interest groups that continually lobby governments. No suggestion that they are insidious or sinister.

Oh dear, no. Selective indignation, dear readers, is anti-Semitism.

As a young boy growing up in the aftermath of World War II, I hoped that anti-Semitism would gradually fade away. Regrettably, that has not been the case. It is alive and well and, it would appear, still common among what was once called polite society.

Barry Cohen is a former minister in the Hawke government.

# reads: 771

Original piece is,25197,23732124-7583,00.html

Printable version

Tell us what you think

Brilliant article. I'm stunned that someone in a public position would hold these sentiments, let alone actually express them! I'm even more stunned that she is on the 'conservative' side of politics, but things aren't all as they seem these days and there are people in parties who don't represent the party's original premise. It's a sick travesty that these attitudes exist towards Israel who has committed no unprovoked aggression and is simply trying to defend their citizens from death. I don't understand why Israel. Where is the deep-rooted hatred towards countries like China who actually colonize other countries by force (Tibet) or against Iran whose leader expresses a desire to wipe another country off the map! Susan Chandler should be asked to hand in her resignation immediately. She's lucky she's not being sued for her rude insults.

Posted by Dee on 2008-05-26 09:58:27 GMT

Susan Chandler needs some remedial political correctness training. As a public figure both potentially influential and subject to intense scrutiny in our overly documented world of 2008, she clearly let her guard down to show off her true colors. She is a racist and bigot of the worst kind and I hope the negative publicity she receives from this creates an opportunity for her to search her soul and decide to change her manner in a positive way to promote harmony and understanding. Thanks to Barry Cohen for a great article; well written, enlightening and important.

Posted by H.L. Fleming on 2008-05-23 01:42:11 GMT

A polite society is not a guaranty for a civilized society. Germany was considered civilized yet it produced the worst holocaust in history. Japan’s society is considered very cultured but history shows Japanese army as one of the cruelest.

Posted by GBCAZ on 2008-05-22 02:30:32 GMT

I sent this article on to George Negus because it takes one to know one!

Posted by Elaine on 2008-05-21 14:35:47 GMT

Thanks Barry Cohen. Spot on. And here's more: My late esteemed father had the supposed honour of being invited to become a member of a Club in Melbourne which shall remain nameless. He delighted in saying that when he heard Jews were not considered worthy of being his fellow club members(he was not one) he refused forthwith. (Wonder about their policy these days? Haven't ever bothered to find out). And in the school ground today... Did you know that young Oz kids can still be heard slinging a derogatory..."You dirty Jew" to each other. Ask them what they mean or how to spell 'Jew' and you get a blank look and attempts like 'd--e-w' ...'d-u-e' ...'j-o-o'. So what's new?

Posted by Anna on 2008-05-21 12:24:48 GMT

Anti semitism has always been with us.Jews can never get it right -they are either too rich,too poor ,too industrious,too lazy,too clever,too obsequious etc etc.If G-d forbid the world were judenrein but we were to take our contributions,inventions etc with us ,how would the world look or manage? If we cant please theworld regardless,let us at least please ourselves by not making useless sacrifices and territorial concessions which only increase the terrorand violence we face in Israel. Good on you Barry Cohen

Posted by ella on 2008-05-21 09:15:50 GMT

A great article that says it as it is. It has got to such a stage nowadays that defenders of Israel don't dare to mention the word "anti-Semitism". Unfortunately some of the worst offenders are Jews, who say that they can't be anti-Semites.

Posted by Sam on 2008-05-21 05:46:08 GMT

This is a special article it makes the points so well.

Posted on 2008-05-21 04:26:13 GMT

Excellent article, but water off a duck's back. Personally, I think anti-semitism is a genetic condition. What else can explain the irrational anti- Jewish traditions right throughout the ages? No doubt, one day the DNA strand identification will pick up the elusive "ASG" (anti-semitic gene) which will clearly show how correct the Torah was/is when it stats "Esau Soneh et Ya'akov". (Esau, the sages tell us, relates to non Jews in general). Of course it begs the question as to why there are righteous gentiles who have assisted Jews. The obvious answer is that their ASG has mutated and is malfunctioning, not doing what it was programmed to do, akin somewhat to a cancer, but in a positive sense, with life sustaining positive outcomes.

Posted by Food for thought on 2008-05-21 00:19:39 GMT

If education is the key to our problems, how come the most educated seem to be the most ignorant. It is "education" that has painted the picture of the Jew as greedy, cunning, deceitful,and in the case of Islam, pig, unhuman and so on. What we need is for our so-called educators to be educated. Don't hold your breath.

Posted by Philip Hammond on 2008-05-20 23:31:35 GMT

Yesher Koach Barry, for standing up and telling it like it is... We need to also remember, and remind others, that Israel's right to self determination is not founded just on sympathy because of the Shoah, nor even the UN partition resolution. Christian anti-Semitism commenced 2,000 years ago, and Muslim anti-Semitism commenced over 1,000 years ago. The Jewish people's claim to the land of Israel commenced many thousands of years ago...

Posted by sandgroper on 2008-05-20 23:17:42 GMT