masthead

Powered byWebtrack Logo

Links

Day to mourn, not celebrate, human rights

Ignoring the pleas of victims around the world, the UN Human Rights Council is locked on to a political agenda that uses the rhetoric of international law as a weapon in the political war targeting Israel.

The Organisation of the Islamic Conference, which controls the UNHRCs agenda and chooses its officials, has no interest in opening a discussion of the systematic oppression of women or minorities in Saudi Arabia, Syria, Libya, Gaza, etc.

Israel is a convenient diversion, which explains the obsessive focus on "war crimes" claims, including the biased mandate of the Goldstone report on the Gaza conflict.

To make matters worse, the non-governmental human rights watchdogs that were created to offset the unethical behaviour and biases of governments, have become accomplices in promoting oppression.

Superpowers like Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, the Paris-based International Federation of Human Rights and similar groups with multi-million-dollar budgets work closely with and support the agendas of the UNHRC and other international frameworks.

Instead of speaking truth to this blatant abuse of power, officials of these self-proclaimed human rights groups are part of the problem, remaining largely silent while the abuses in Africa, Asia or the Arab world continue.

The past year has seen even greater co-operation between the UN and the NGOs in twisting human rights values beyond recognition. Human Rights Watch was caught attempting to raise funds from wealthy members of Saudi Arabia's elite.

Instead of leading the campaign against the abuses imposed by the Wahabi religious police, this "watchdog" hosted a member of the Shura council at a dinner which featured more Israel-bashing and dark warnings of the power of "pro-Israel pressure groups".

Other scandals, including the suspension of HRW's "senior military analyst", and unanswered questions about his professional qualifications, further tarnished this organisation. In parallel, Amnesty International and the other groups have accelerated the effort to transform human rights and international law into ideological platforms used against Western democracies and open societies.

Like HRW, a highly disproportionate percentage of Amnesty's reports and campaigns focus on criticising the US and NATO countries for alleged infractions in Iraq and Afghanistan, while terrorists and their state supporters get relatively little attention.

This is a paternalistic and patronising distortion, which assumes that Muslims in al-Qa'ida or Afghan Taliban "militants" are exempt from human rights requirements, and are held to a lower standard.

But at the end of 2009 there are some signs of hope for the human rights community.

The "halo effect" that had protected powerful groups from research and criticism has begun to break down. HRW founder Robert Bernstein published an oped in The New York Times in which he denounced his own organisation for betraying its moral principles.

Although HRW officials launched a campaign to discredit Bernstein and other critics (particularly NGO Monitor), in order to restore their lost credibility, others realise the need for an entirely new and unbiased leadership, particularly in activities related to the Middle East. On another front, the Canadian government has moved to halt the funnelling of millions of taxpayer funds to organisations that exploit the rhetoric of human rights in order to promote radical ideologies that undermine these values.

In the 1970s, radical groups that claimed to promote "social progress" and "solidarity" politics were able to obtain substantial funding from sympathetic officials in Canada and in liberal European governments.

By putting an end to this inversion, the Canadians can also contribute to a return to the core moral and universal principles of human rights.

For people committed to the substance, and not only the language, of human rights, these developments suggest that a tipping point has been reached.

The absurdity of a Libyan official chairing UN human rights sessions in which Iran, Darfur and China are erased from the agenda, with the assistance of groups like Amnesty and HRW, may finally be too great to ignore.

Professor Gerald M. Steinberg teaches political science at Bar Ilan University and heads NGO Monitor, (Jerusalem, Israel)


# reads: 307

Original piece is http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/day-to-mourn-not-celebrate-human-rights/story-e6frg6ux-1225809960199


Print
Printable version

Tell us what you think


Steinberg is a bit too optimistic; the human rights industry will overcome any pressure toward decency. What is also missing is that there is a trend for radicals to infiltate and subvert various good causes. In doing so they pursue their nefarious agendas under the guise of the "good cause". It is no use criticising the NGOs without also attacking the intellectualising elites who feel the need to make amends for any harm - real or fabricated - done to non-whites, the mohammedans who refuse to condemn any bestiality to their own or others, as long as it is done in the name of Allah and the power plays by nations and institutions in which Jews and Israel are but a salient of the war on democracy which threatens the grip on power of dictatorships. It is perhaps unrealistic to expect the UNHCR to pursue real human rights violators as they would have to condemn themselves and as we are all told, their states are models we need to emulate. In a nut shell, as long as we speak in a polite rational manner, we will get nowhere. Instead of trying to create good relations and harmony, we must talk truth to powerful hypocrites, clearly, plainly, loudly and consistently.

Posted by paul2 on 2009-12-14 12:17:27 GMT


he"s an optimist. The group he refers to is working to a plan, and the "people committed to the substance, and not only the language, of human rights" are nowhere near as organised. There may already be too much momentum in favour of the leftists who attack the West. It"s nice to hear his voice, though. Wish there were more people expressing his views openly.

Posted by mm on 2009-12-14 06:25:40 GMT