Sheba Medical Centre
Melanie Phillips
Shariah Finance Watch
Australian Islamist Monitor - MultiFaith
West Australian Friends of Israel
Why Israel is at war
Lozowick Blog
NeoZionoid The NeoZionoiZeoN blog
Blank pages of the age
Silent Runnings
Jewish Issues watchdog
Discover more about Israel advocacy
Zionists the creation of Israel
Dissecting the Left
Paula says
Perspectives on Israel - Zionists
Zionism & Israel Information Center
Zionism educational seminars
Christian dhimmitude
Forum on Mideast
Israel Blog - documents terror war against Israelis
Zionism on the web
RECOMMENDED: newsback News discussion community
RSS Feed software from CarP
International law, Arab-Israeli conflict
Think-Israel
The Big Lies
Shmloozing with terrorists
IDF ON YOUTUBE
Israel's contributions to the world
MEMRI
Mark Durie Blog
The latest good news from Israel...new inventions, cures, advances.
support defenders of Israel
The Gaza War 2014
The 2014 Gaza Conflict Factual and Legal Aspects
UPDATE IV: Thoughts of the former editor-in-chief of The Age, Michael Gawenda:
Caroline, I think the real question here is what publication of this article says about the prevailing journalistic culture at The Age. The apology is a non-apology really. It apologises for the hurt it caused some people, especially Jews. This is a clayton’s apology--the sort, for instance, that Wayne Carey once offered up when he apologied for grabbing a young woman’s breast. The apology states that The Age does not hold the views expressed in the article. I assume The Age publishes many oped pieces that do not express the views of The Age. What this apology seems to be aimed at doing is limit the damage to the paper from the publication of this piece. What I want to know is how it came to be published and how The Age has reached the point where racist rubbish like this gets published. And what the new editor in chief intends to do about changing this culture.
Original piece was at http://blogs.theaustralian.news.com.au/coverington/index.php
The old addage "Evil happens when good people turn a blind eye" is particularly appropriate here. One would have hoped that the Age"s position would be that this level of bigotry is unacceptable, and those responsible are also accountable. The behind closed doors message may be "don"t do it again", or perhaps even "great article but it won"t be well-received by the public for a little while longer" ... who knows? Whatever it is, it is clearly the mildest of wrist slaps, if that ... a wink-wink-nudge-nudge tolerance of the worst that antisemitism has offered verbally over the ages and right into this Age. Perhaps it"s up to advertisers, especially Jewish ones, to vote with their feet, and move their support and dollars to a credible newspaper like the Australian, one that doesn"t exhibit a pattern of anti-Israeli and anti-Jewish invective.
Posted by Morry on 2009-01-21 02:49:34 GMT
WOuld they publish a piece from the KKK? The NeoNazis? The Muslim Brotherhood? Because that"s what this piece sounded like. It"s not about "offending" people -- it"s about peddling the evil lies of the Protocols of Zion. The "Palestinians" won"t "make friend" with the Jews because their religion tells them the Jews must be totally dominated and humiliated, if they live in a SHaria state, or dead if they refuse.
Posted on 2009-01-21 02:41:44 GMT
Australia, you are not alone among the nations of bigots, a recycled 2000 years old fashion has become once again in vogue, its practioners learned in mecca, York, Berlin and Damascus how to apply it. Australia is but a late comer.
Posted
by A.R on 2009-01-20 17:27:03 GMT