masthead

Powered byWebtrack Logo

Links

To get maximum benefit from the ICJS website Register now. Select the topics which interest you.

6068 6287 6301 6308 6309 6311 6328 6337 6348 6384 6386 6388 6391 6398 6399 6410 6514 6515 6517 6531 6669 6673

A Good Use for Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize

The U.S. president could give meaning to his medal by giving it to Iranian rights activist Shirin Ebadi.

When, back in October, the Nobel Prize Committee announced that U.S. President Barack Obama was their 2009 laureate, the president responded that he was 'surprised and deeply humbled' by the decision to bestow the prize on him, despite having accomplished little, so far, in the pursuit of peace. Calling it "a call to action to confront the common challenges of the 21st century," Mr. Obama went on to say that "I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many transformative figures that have been honored by this prize." Many felt the President was right, and his selection was roundly criticized for being an empty gesture by the Committee—more pique against Mr Obama's predecessor than acknowledgment of worthy foreign policy achievements, which regrettably are still yet to come.

But now, with Mr. Obama due in Oslo this week to receive the prize, the President has an opportunity to give meaning to this empty gesture, thereby becoming truly worthy of his fellow laureates.

One of the transformative figures that precede him on the laureates' roster has been the victim of an unprecedented outrage. The 2003 Nobel Prize laureate and Iran's foremost human rights advocate, Shirin Ebadi, was recently robbed of her medal, alongside several other prizes (including the French Legion d'honneur) by order of Tehran's Revolutionary Court. The Islamic Republic of Iran raided her husband's bank safe and seized all their valuables. Her bank account was also frozen and her pension suspended. The regime claims she owes $410,000 in unpaid taxes—but this is clearly a baseless allegation and another brazen attempt by Tehran to silence one of its most outspoken and effective critics. Her human rights center in Tehran was shut down recently and three of her colleagues have been arrested. She still has her personal freedom—but only because she has not returned to Iran yet. One can expect to see her jailed upon return. Her plight is the plight of Iran—a country whose tyrannical regime Mr. Obama has unsuccessfully tried to engage since taking office last January.

President Obama is the leader of the free world—though his tepid support for Iran's beleaguered pro-democracy movement may suggest he is uncomfortable with this role. Ms. Ebadi is the symbol of defiance against a liberticidal regime, which, to use the President's own words, represents a "common challenge of the 21st century," and one which the president still must confront. They have the Nobel Prize in common. Let it be a way to bridge the gap between the president's ill-fated efforts to engage Ms. Ebadi's oppressors, and America's historic commitment to liberty abroad. And let it be a way to turn the Nobel Prize Committee's choice into a powerful message in the service of peace—for the best way to promote peace is to champion freedom.

The president's engagement strategy with the Islamic Republic has so far yielded little progress on Iran's nuclear program, but offered much cover to Iran's regime. Clearly, internal repression is not Mr. Obama's fault—but his premature award and his pledge to use it as an encouragement to future worthy endeavours offer him an opportunity, after past equivocations, to let Iranians know where he truly stands on the critical issue of their freedom. In Oslo, as the president accepts the award, he should donate his medal to Ms. Ebadi and invite her to the White House for the hand-over. Mr. Obama has already said that the money award of $1.4 million attached to the prize will go to charitable causes. In Oslo, he should similarly direct the Nobel Prize Committee to use the sum to pay Md. Ebadi's trumped up fines—and hopefully spend the rest on Iran-related human rights causes.

Iran, surely, will not get off her back. The regime might even use this as an excuse to accuse her of treason—for being an agent in the pay of no less than the U.S. president!

But the president would deliver a powerful message to the world: That peace cannot be achieved at the expense of oppression. And, to the beleaguered Iranian dissidents, he would signal that America remains firmly on the side of freedom in Iran.

Mr. Ottolenghi is a fellow at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies and the author of Under a Mushroom Cloud: Europe, Iran and the Bomb (London, Profile Books: 2009)


# reads: 177

Original piece is http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107104574573591576601798.html#printMode


Print
Printable version

Google

Articles RSS Feed


News