Powered byWebtrack Logo


To get maximum benefit from the ICJS website Register now. Select the topics which interest you.

6068 6287 6301 6308 6309 6311 6328 6337 6348 6384 6386 6388 6391 6398 6399 6410 6514 6515 6517 6531 6669 6673

An open letter to President Barack Obama published today

Full Text of Letter from Ronald S. Lauder to President Obama

15 April 2010

Dear President Obama: 

I write today as a proud American and a proud Jew.

Jews around the world are concerned today.  We are concerned about the nuclear ambitions of an Iranian regime that brags about its genocidal intentions against Israel.  We are concerned that the Jewish state is being isolated and delegitimized.

Mr. President, we are concerned about the dramatic deterioration of diplomatic relations between the United States and Israel.

The Israeli housing bureaucracy made a poorly timed announcement and your Administration branded it an “insult.”  This diplomatic faux pas was over the fourth stage of a seven stage planning permission process – a plan to build homes years from now in a Jewish area of Jerusalem that under any peace agreement would remain an integral part of Israel.

Our concern grows to alarm as we consider some disturbing questions.  Why does the thrust of this Administration’s Middle East rhetoric seem to blame Israel for the lack of movement on peace talks? After all, it is the Palestinians, not Israel, who refuse to negotiate.

Israel has made unprecedented concessions.  It has enacted the most far reaching West Bank settlement moratorium in Israeli history.

Israel has publicly declared support for a two-state solution.  Conversely, many Palestinians continue their refusal to even acknowledge Israel’s right to exist.

The conflict’s root cause has always been the Palestinian refusal to accept Israel as the nation state of the Jewish people.  Every American President who has tried to broker a peace agreement has collided with that Palestinian intransigence, sooner or later.  Recall President Clinton’s anguish when his peace proposals were bluntly rejected by the Palestinians in 2000.  Settlements were not the key issue then.

They are not the key issue now.

Another important question is this:  what is the Administration’s position on Israel’s borders in any final status agreement?  Ambiguity on this matter has provoked a wave of rumors and anxiety.  Can it be true that America is no longer committed to a final status agreement that provides defensible borders for Israel?  Is a new course being charted that would leave Israel with the indefensible borders that invited invasion prior to 1967?

There are significant moves from the Palestinian side to use those indefensible borders as the basis for a future unilateral declaration of independence.  How would the United States respond to such a reckless course of action?

And what are America’s strategic ambitions in the broader Middle East?  The Administration’s desire to improve relations with the Muslim world is well known.  But is friction with Israel part of this new strategy?  Is it assumed worsening relations with Israel can improve relations with Muslims?  History is clear on the matter:  appeasement does not work.  It can achieve the opposite of what is intended.

And what about the most dangerous player in the region?  Shouldn’t the United States remain focused on the single biggest threat that confronts the world today?  That threat is a nuclear armed Iran.  Israel is not only America’s closest ally in the Middle East, it is the one most committed to this Administration’s declared aim of ensuring Iran does not get nuclear weapons.

Mr. President, we embrace your sincerity in your quest to seek a lasting peace.  But we urge you to take into consideration the concerns expressed above.  Our great country and the tiny State of Israel have long shared the core values of freedom and democracy.  It is a bond much treasured by the Jewish people.  In that spirit I submit, most respectfully, that it is time to end our public feud with Israel and to confront the real challenges that we face together.

Yours sincerely,

Ronald S. Lauder


World Jewish Congress

# reads: 718

Printable version


Articles RSS Feed


Tell us what you think

I like the plain speaking of Ronald Lauder. But I doubt it will have any impact on Obama.

Posted by Ruth on 2010-04-17 13:49:04 GMT

Shyrla is onto something. Obama"s staff will take note of Lauder"s letter, but so long as Obama has strong support from Jewish voters, he"ll feel free to continue on his current track. The misinformation on Israel and the Middle East that uncommitted, Jewishly-uneducated and non-communal Jews labor under has made them fall for the Arab narrative that posits that if there is no peace, it must somehow be the fault of Israel and the Jews. Perhaps Lauder was writing the letter for Jewish (and other) voters to read? Or perhaps he should have written it that way? Proud, educated, informed Jews cannot possibly support Obama the way large numbers of American Jews currently do. (Kurzer, Indyk, Emmanuel, etc. are plainly not "proud" Jews; they are embarassed embarrasments.)

Posted by Jake in Jerusalem on 2010-04-15 20:39:49 GMT

I"m sure the President will take note of your charming and polite letter, Mr Lauder. Really, what you and your fellow proud Jews and Americans need to do is to make sure you vote him out at the next opportunity and stop being hypnotised by his rhetoric. Obama is no friend of Israel, and he doesn"t seem to be a friend of America, either.

Posted by Shyrla Pakula on 2010-04-15 13:28:55 GMT