Sheba Medical Centre
Melanie Phillips
Shariah Finance Watch
Australian Islamist Monitor - MultiFaith
West Australian Friends of Israel
Why Israel is at war
Lozowick Blog
NeoZionoid The NeoZionoiZeoN blog
Blank pages of the age
Silent Runnings
Jewish Issues watchdog
Discover more about Israel advocacy
Zionists the creation of Israel
Dissecting the Left
Paula says
Perspectives on Israel - Zionists
Zionism & Israel Information Center
Zionism educational seminars
Christian dhimmitude
Forum on Mideast
Israel Blog - documents terror war against Israelis
Zionism on the web
RECOMMENDED: newsback News discussion community
RSS Feed software from CarP
International law, Arab-Israeli conflict
Think-Israel
The Big Lies
Shmloozing with terrorists
IDF ON YOUTUBE
Israel's contributions to the world
MEMRI
Mark Durie Blog
The latest good news from Israel...new inventions, cures, advances.
support defenders of Israel
The Gaza War 2014
The 2014 Gaza Conflict Factual and Legal Aspects
To get maximum benefit from the ICJS website Register now. Select the topics which interest you.
Our reference AJ
Sally Hunt
General Secretary
Association of University Teachers
Egmont House
25-31 Tavistock Place
London
WC1H 9UT
10 May 2005
BY FAX & BY POST
Dear Madam
The University of Haifa
We act for the University of Haifa. Our client has been defamed by a resolution passed at your annual Council Meeting. This resolution now appears on your website. The defamation is therefore a continuing one.
At its annual Council Meeting held on 20-22 April 2005, the AUT passed a number of boycott resolutions aimed at Israeli academics and institutions. Among those was a resolution calling upon AUT members to boycott our client. The resolution received the most perfunctory debate, it was held at a time that made it impossible for most Jews to attend, requests for the rescheduling of the debate were refused, and no delegates were allowed to speak against the resolution.
The allegations made against the University of Haifa in the resolution are damaging to its reputation. These allegations, which are false, were not put to the university prior to the debate on the resolution.
This letter has two purposes: first, to give you the information that you would have received had you consulted with the university prior to the resolution being put; and secondly, to communicate to you the university's position in relation to the AUT's role in assisting the resolution's sponsors and thereafter disseminating its defamatory allegations.
The resolution
In summary, the resolution alleges that:
The defamations of the university, though multiple and serious, amount to the proposition that it is not, at any rate in respect of research into the character and origins of the State of Israel, an institution that places the values of academic freedom above its corporate commitment to the State, to the present Government of the State, and to the Government's policies.
Indeed the university, the resolution insists, persecutes those of its members who dare to dissent from those policies even when their dissent is founded in unimpeachable research.
The truth
Had the council agenda committee contacted the University of Haifa before allowing the resolution to be put it would have discovered the following:
The Academic Disciplinary Court of its own volition dismissed the complaint on 19 May. Dr Pappe was not called upon to offer any defence. He was promptly notified of the decision on the 21 May.
However, following legal action by members of the Brigade, Mr Katz admitted in court that there was no basis to the claim that a massacre in Tantura took place. He added that he believed the Alexandroni veterans (who denied the massacre), and offered his sincere apology to the soldiers and their families. He retracted his claim concerning a "massacre." This retraction was accepted by the Tel Aviv District Court and was given effect as a judgment of the Court.
Mr Katz later made attempts to withdraw his retraction and appealed to both the District and Supreme Courts. The appeals were dismissed.
The university thereupon established an academic committee of enquiry composed of faculty members unconnected with the preparation of the thesis.
The committee was instructed to examine the adequacy of Mr Katz's transcripts of interview tapes in his thesis. The committee found that in some places there were significant discrepancies between the tapes, Mr Katz's own notes, and the text of his thesis.
The Graduate Studies Authority (GSA) gave Mr Katz the opportunity to correct the thesis. Upon revision and resubmission, it was sent to five reviewers. Their reports were highly critical of its research quality. Based upon these reports, the GSA decided that the MA degree based on research should be withdrawn and that an ordinary MA degree be awarded in its place.
There have never been any recriminations from the university itself against Dr Pappe, whether due to his support of Teddy Katz or his calls to boycott Israeli academic institutions. Indeed, the university has shown great tolerance towards Dr Pappe despite his own obvious contempt for it.
Nevertheless, and in this regard, no action of any kind has been taken against Dr Pappe by the university, nor has any action against him been threatened.
Dr Pappe's own department, the School of Political Science, reflects the diversity of the university at large. Between them, Dr Pappe's colleagues have espoused views that reflect the entire political spectrum in relation to the Israel-Palestinian conflict. None has been reprimanded.
The University of Haifa's position
The AUT has, both by the assistance it gave to the resolution's sponsors and by its publication of the resolution on its website, defamed the University of Haifa. Our client is entitled to seek damages, a retraction, and an undertaking against further publication of the defamations. It reserves its position in this regard.
In the meantime, it awaits the outcome of the Special Meeting to be held on 26 May 2005. It trusts that, once equipped with the truth, the delegates will vote to overturn the boycott.
Please confirm that a copy of this letter will be made available forthwith to all AUT members.
Yours faithfully
Mishcon de Reya
Mishcon de Reya Solicitors
Direct Tel: +44 20 7440 7025
Direct Fax: +44 20 8203 0981