To get maximum benefit from the ICJS website Register now. Select the topics which interest you.
LITTLE ROCK — A federal judge on Wednesday let stand an Arkansas law requiring state contractors to pledge not to boycott Israel, ruling that such a boycott is not protected by the First Amendment.
U.S. District Judge Brian Miller dismissed the lawsuit the Arkansas Times had filed challenging the 2017 law. The newspaper had asked the judge to block the law, which requires contractors with the state to reduce their fees by 20 percent if they don't sign the pledge.
The Times' lawsuit said the University of Arkansas Pulaski Technical College refused to contract for advertising with the newspaper unless the Arkansas Times signed the pledge. The paper isn't engaged in a boycott against Israel.
Miller wrote that refusing to purchase items isn't protected speech. He noted that the Times wouldn't be barred from other protected forms of speech, including writing or picketing against Israel policies.
"It may even call upon others to boycott Israel, write in support of such boycotts, and engage in picketing and pamphleteering to that effect. This does not mean, however, that its decision to refuse to deal, or to refrain from purchasing certain goods, is protected by the First Amendment," Miller wrote.
"We disagree with the district court's decision, which contradicts two recent federal court decisions and which would radically limit the First Amendment right to boycott," said Holly Dickson, legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas, which represented the Times.
Attorney General Leslie Rutledge's office, which had defended the law, argued the pledge didn't force the newspaper to take a political position.
"Attorney General Rutledge is pleased with Judge Miller's ruling dismissing the Arkansas Times' meritless lawsuit and upholding state law prohibiting discrimination against Israel, an important American ally," Amanda Priest, a spokeswoman for Rutledge, said.
The sponsor of Arkansas' law said he's working on a proposal similar to Kansas' revision that would raise the minimum amount for contracts where the pledge would be enforced.
"The reality is when we're passing laws we want them to be fair and right and just and if we need to correct something to make it function and work better, that's what we want to do," Republican Sen. Bart Hester said.
(All contents © copyright 2019 Associated Press. All rights reserved.)