Powered byWebtrack Logo


To get maximum benefit from the ICJS website Register now. Select the topics which interest you.

6068 6287 6301 6308 6309 6311 6328 6337 6348 6384 6386 6388 6391 6398 6399 6410 6514 6515 6517 6531 6669 6673

Summary of IDF investigation of incident on the Gaza beach

Summary of IDF investigation of incident on the Gaza beach (9 June 2006)
13 Jun 2006

Defense Minister Amir Peretz, IDF Chief of Staff Dan Halutz and Major General Meir Kalifi held a press conference in Tel Aviv (June 13) to present the findings of the investigation.


(Comunicated by the IDF Spokesman)

Following is a summary of the information presented on Tuesday, 13 June 2006:

Defense Minister Peretz: "We have enough findings to back up the suspicion that the intention to describe this as an Israeli event is simply not correct. The accumulating evidence proves that this incident was not due to Israeli forces."

Maj Gen. Meir Kalifi: In order to determine whether the claim that the IDF was responsible for the incident on the Gaza shore on Friday was true or false we needed to determine the exact time and place of the incident. The investigation was based on intelligence analysis, Palestinian claims, media coverage of the incident and IDF filmed footage that documented all IDF activity during that day.  

We can say that the incident took place 150 meters from a place we call the "Casino". The time of the incident was between 16:57-17:10. We came to this conclusion by analyzing three films. The first shows nothing irregular or unusual that might indicate that a large explosion took place in a range of 50 meters from the place of the incident on the beach between 16:54-16:57. A second film, from around 18:30, depicts people's behavior after the explosion, proving that the incident must have occurred before then. The third film shows the arrival of the ambulances at 17:15 which brings us to the conclusion that the incident occurred not before 16:57 and not after 17:10.

Taking this timeline in account we have checked all reports of IDF fire on that day. I can without doubt say that no means used by the IDF during this time period caused the incident. The closest IAF attack took place 2.5 kilometers north of the site and occurred after 17:15.

Concerning naval fire, 17 shells were fired at areas 700 meters from the site of the incident. The naval shells fired in proximity to the location of the explosion landed between 11:00 AM and 12:00 noon. We have documentation of where all the shells landed. It proves that all shells were launched approximately four hours before the incident.

We can also dismiss the cause being an IDF artillery shell, launched from the land. During those hours we fired six shells at a target called Reshef 31. In order to make sure we do not hit areas with citizens we fired range-adjustment fire approximately 580-600 meters north of the target. Using a special system we can precisely account for the places where five of the six shells landed. The first shell which was fired was not identified by the system, btt the possibility of the first shell fired from the battery causing the incident is close to zero, as it was launched at around 16:30.

In addition a piece of shrapnel was found in the wound of one of the Palestinians who was injured and received medical treatment in Israel. The shrapnel was taken for examination in a laboratory. The examination showed that, without a doubt, the shrapnel was not a part of an IDF artillery shell.

So, all possibilities that the cause of the explosion was an artillery shell fired on that Friday have been disproved.

Chief of Staff Halutz: We need to remember the context of this incident. In the past few weeks Israeli civilians who live in the western Negev, especially in the city of Sderot, have been under a constant shower of Qassam rockets. We are operating in order to reduce this.

Concerning the incident on the Gaza beach:

On Saturday evening I expressed our regret for the members of the Palestinian family who were killed, and I emphasized that expressing regret does not mean taking responsibility. Today I state clearly we still regret the incident, but we are not responsible for it.

Concerning the aerial attack in Gaza City (Tuesday, June 13) :

Today's event should also be looked upon in context: the attempt to launch Katyusha rockets. May I remind you that Katyusha rockets have a longer range than Qassams. They can reach deeper into the western and northern Negev. That is why we are so determined to stop the launching of Katyusha rockets.

We regret hitting those who were not involved in terror activity, and still, I remind you that terror organizations operate in populated areas and we will not allow terror cells to carry out attacks against Israel under that cover. The Palestinian Authority and the Palestinians need to take all means needed in order to stop the launching of projectile rockets.



""  E-mail to a friend
""  Print the article
""  Add to my bookmarks
""  See also
  "" PM Olmert comments at Cabinet meeting on Kassams and Gaza incident
  "" Inquiry committee established into Gaza incident
  "" Summary of events in the Gaza Strip 11-Jun-2006
"" External links
 "" Haaretz: IDF probe: Gaza beach blast not caused by wayward army shell

# reads: 607

Original piece is

Printable version


Articles RSS Feed